This page is for the nomination of featured articles. Click here to nominate images or quotes.
If you see an article that is, in your opinion, very good, then here is the place to nominate it to be featured article shown on the main page.
At this point, the nomination system is deliberately kept simple. The article with the most votes (at least 3) is removed from this pool and placed on the main page, and remains there until the next article is featured. There is no queue involved. If a nominee remains in the pool for more than 4 months with an insufficient number of votes, the nominee will be removed. It may, however, be nominated again.
Please add new nominations at the bottom of the page.
When voting, you can vote For or Against (please provide a reason if voting against, and preferably if voting for as well). Or you can add a Comment without actually voting. You can vote for any number of entries at once, but only with one vote per entry.
You must be a registered user to vote. If you are an anonymous user, register now- it's fast and easy.
Nominating and For. Very informative read, very well done in my opinion, and the Ori are the last of the Big Baddies that the SGC got to fight themselves. Mr White(talk) (Contribs) 01:08, June 11, 2010 (UTC)
For. It's very nice article. Plus they are a major Big Bad. -4339shw(talk) (Contribs) 01:36, September 4, 2010 (UTC)
For. Good article on one of Stargate's major enemies. - Bell'Orso(talk) (Contribs) 13:01, October 27, 2010 (UTC)
Nominating and for. Another really detailed and descriptive battle article. Well-written, and it thoroughly describes one of the better battles in SGA... not to mention those images and quotes. It's all good... (my own bias aside)—Anubis 10545 01:31, 12 July 2009 (UTC)
For. Wow yeah i agree with Anubis.. very detailed article.... Jenkins08Chat | Contribs - - 07:19, December 1, 2009 (UTC)
Nominating and for. I built on it, described just about every action she took, even in episode where you only see her say "hi" and then walk away. Nominating it. -- Matthew R Dunn 20:09, 7 May 2009 (UTC)
For. I am a really big Dr. Keller fan, and the article is good. --KellerLover9178 13:20, November 2009 (UTC)
Nominating and for. A really detailed article, images.... and all that stuff. Somewhere, I think Ka'lel suggested that having an SGU featured article soon after it premiered would be.... a good thing and might attract viewers. It's not just because I slaved over it for hours that I'm suggesting it mind you :) It really is one of our most detailed episode descriptions... and I'm not just saying that to make myself feel good... mind you :) —Anubis 10545(talk) (Contribs) 00:11, October 9, 2009 (UTC)
For. Excellent work on the article, certainly has my vote, and I enjoyed reading it. Mind you I do notice some spelling errors, which would hopefully be taken care of. -- Matthew R Dunn(talk) (Contribs) 01:03, October 9, 2009 (UTC)
For. Agreed for all the reasons above. Cheers. Kal'elT | C - 02:46, October 9, 2009 (UTC)