Does anyone else think it's funny how "The Stargate Omnipedia at GateWorld aims to be the world's most accurate, thorough and complete encyclopedia of the Stargate universe!" - and yet obviously the ultimate resource is here :D They can't talk about comprehensive when we have articles on flipping cereal boxes! Also, half their stuff is wrong or out of date... I think they aught to just delete it and link here! We need to make a forum signiture banner so people can advertise the site :) Sman789 (talk) (Contribs) 00:23, June 12, 2010 (UTC)

I know... it's crazy. I just put a link to my page and SG wiki as my gateworld sig... tho I haven't actually posted anything for.... it's been quite some time actually... —Anubis 10545 (talk) (Contribs) 03:13, June 12, 2010 (UTC)
...And by "just" I mean "only".. it has been there for a longggg time. —Anubis 10545 (talk) (Contribs) 05:21, June 12, 2010 (UTC)


thats what they call asgard beam weapons. -TheZat (talk) (Contribs) 19:45, November 28, 2012 (UTC)

Ad blocker interference detected!

Wikia is a free-to-use site that makes money from advertising. We have a modified experience for viewers using ad blockers

Wikia is not accessible if you’ve made further modifications. Remove the custom ad blocker rule(s) and the page will load as expected.