If you'd like to learn more about working with the nuts and bolts of this wiki, I have a few links that you might want to check out:
One other suggestion: If you're going to make comments on talk pages or make other sorts of comments, please be sure to sign them with four tildes (~~~~) to paste in your user name and the date/time of the comment.
If you have any questions, please feel free to post them in the forum, ask me on my talk page or check out our Community Portal.
Ascension Research labEdit
There is the ASCENSION RESEARCH LAB which is the one from Hide and Seek, then there is the ASCESION LAB from Tao of Rodney. Stop switchign them up!
He had it right. The lab from Hide and Seek was just a research lab (hence the name). The lab from Tao of Rodney was used to make people ascend. leave it alone. Lowriders95s10 (talk) (Contribs) 00:16, May 13, 2010 (UTC)
i copied what was nessecary from one page to the other and deleted that which was in the wrong section. ive already told a mod about this.
- And the Lucian Alliance also held the Odyssey for an episode. Doesn't automatically make the ship theirs just because they can succeed for a short period. 14:50, June 12, 2010 (UTC)
really? i must have missed the part where todd told us that the darts beamed up the zpm's??? human appear on the same field that they do if they are beamed up, so would a zpm, it would be a few feet off the ground and fall to the ground and smash. they zpms were in a bag and it was implied that they were put in said bag before being beamed into the dart, most likely being held by a wraith. Escyos (talk) (Contribs) 05:40, August 17, 2010 (UTC)
hahahah..thats what your basing that on!? an internal beaimgin device is COMPLETELY differnet to one on a dart, the internal one, would be able to have physical connections to other locations while darts do not. you can stop trying to get me to see the wrong side, not going to happen. Escyos (talk) (Contribs) 06:18, August 17, 2010 (UTC)
like I said, i am not going to believe you. as far as im concerned you dont do anything constructive on this wiki. go away, dont talk to me again please Escyos (talk) (Contribs) 06:23, August 17, 2010 (UTC)
HERES YOUR DISCUSSION! THEY ARE MADE BY A FAN. WE DONT USE FAN IMAGES. ALL IMAGES WE USE FROM NON CANON SOURCES ARE BECAUSE WE HAVE NO CANON ONES. Escyos (talk) (Contribs) 08:11, August 21, 2010 (UTC)
Re: Moving pages Edit
My apologies. I absolutely would have used the move button, but it was disabled on that particular page, I suspect due to an edit war. I wished to compromise between the two ideas; bring the content of the page back to "Todd", the canon name for the character for the time being, while acknowledging the blog post containing the character's theoretical true name. Unfortunately, without the ability to move the page, this compromise cannot be reached. Captain J (talk) (Contribs) 00:17, September 1, 2010 (UTC)
Not to contradict you, friend, but the article's opening paragraph just drops "Guide" in at the beginning with a footnote attached to the questionable blog entry. The "first sentence" only serves to confuse. Captain J (talk) (Contribs)
You are correct that Heliopolis was built at the time of the Alliance but the Alliance did not get created millions of years ago. It also got created after the Ancients got back from Pegasus. Same is true for P3R-272. Jimv1983 (talk) (Contribs) 05:22, September 22, 2010 (UTC)
Creation of the Stargate Edit
You recently reverted a change on the "Alteran" page with the comment Stargate didn't exist until the split. I am confused about how this was possible. I do agree with you. In the Ark of Truth we see Amelius leaving Ortus Mallum with the plans for the Stargate. I’m wondering how the Ori had Stargates if they were not invented until after the split. Do you think they invented them independently? It seems unlikely that they would independently invent the same device but I don’t see any other way. Maybe the Ori already knew about Amelius’ research before the Alterans left? Jimv1983 (talk) (Contribs) 19:57, September 26, 2010 (UTC)
- You ever thought that they built them using Ascended knowledge? —Supakillaii (talk) (Contribs) 21:17, September 26, 2010 (UTC)
Nice job with the summary. Did you happen to hear the name of the women that TJ and Caine left the baby with. I know the guys name was Peter and I think I heard her name to be Dana but I wasn't sure. Lowriders95s10 (talk) (Contribs) 03:02, September 29, 2010 (UTC)
Nice updates to the Air, Part 1 summary. Are you rewatching season 1? If so, some character pages are in need of attention. Most notably Rush and Young which are almost completely missing the events from the back half of season 1. I have been working on expanding some of them but could use some help if you could. Lowriders95s10 (talk) (Contribs) 07:53, October 6, 2010 (UTC)
destiny size Edit
offical sorce for destinys size- stargate offical magazine jan/feb 2010 page 84
length 2450 feet
width 1700 feet pseudo wingtips,
height is based on above (and been scaled to pictures) of 330 feet approx)
Thanks - was getting anoying haveing to keep putting it in -shoud have know needed a sorce for it
Did Sharon say her last name when she visited Maryanne? She said something and I didn't catch it but it sounded like it started with a W. Lowriders95s10 (talk) (Contribs) 05:08, October 20, 2010 (UTC)
Wow....really, you just start deleting my edits right after I post them?! I had sources for all of the information I put down, have you even watched the trailer yet? It aired like, an hour ago!!!CourtneyFANno.1 02:27, October 27, 2010 (UTC)
First of all, I am not always jumping the gun, I was entirely correct about the whole Pathogen thing, and second you were the one who thought the infection from Cloverdale was what Chloe had, when it was clearly not, showing Im not the only one making assumtions. Do you accually have any proof were I really did do something so drastically biased?CourtneyFANno.1 02:40, October 27, 2010 (UTC)
Accually, yes there is proof of an attack on Earth. Ming Na practicaly walked on screne and anounced it!CourtneyFANno.1 12:31, October 27, 2010 (UTC)
sorry for my selfish attitude,leaving insulting-like messages on other talk pages about you,but I dont like you the users to fight,so i just want others to focus on other stuff to stop arguing.Smallvilleantonio (talk) (Contribs) 20:52, October 27, 2010 (UTC)
The whole trainler is obviously not taken from a prophetic dream. And such things are usualy not as specific as "nine motherships coming out of hiyperspace to take back Chloe" they are usualy more vague. And just because young has a dream doesnt mean that the aliens wouldnt follow since just after a few episodes they've been proven to be quite determined.CourtneyFANno.1 23:10, October 27, 2010 (UTC)
And I never said scott died or destiny exploded, just that the aliens came to get chloe, that much of the episode is obvious!CourtneyFANno.1 00:09, October 28, 2010 (UTC)
But I didn't say that. If I wanted too I would have. I know scott isnt going to get sucked out into space. Now your jumping the gun with "what ifs". I didn't do that. I won't. That point is irrelivent. Is their anything else you want to bring to my attention?CourtneyFANno.1 01:55, October 28, 2010 (UTC)
And like I said, no prophetic dreams are that specific, and again, they wouldnt base the whole trailer off one vision. Thats to deceiving!CourtneyFANno.1 03:35, October 28, 2010 (UTC)
So in short then you have claims but no proof, just "what ifs" that didnt happen. I don't see any of our claims to have much validity. If you want me to stop editing before an episode comes out just ask, don't start creating scenarios that wont/didnt happenCourtneyFANno.1 03:38, October 28, 2010 (UTC)
No, you didnt ask me you just started deleting my edits without giving reason. It took this whole thing just to get to this point. So don't try and say you did cause you didn't. This is how society works, you make a claim, give a valid reason, and then make your statement, dont just take action without giving just cause. CourtneyFANno.1 03:51, October 28, 2010 (UTC)
And from reading over your talk page, it would seem you do alot of thing without giving reason, so I am not the only one to fault.CourtneyFANno.1 03:54, October 28, 2010 (UTC)
I would like to apologize for enforcing my, now faulted, claims as I did. I will do my best not to overreact next time.CourtneyFANno.1 02:03, November 3, 2010 (UTC)
Hey did you happen to catch the names of the wounded guards that T.J. said. I believe it was Graham, Henderson, and I could not decipher the third. And the guard Greer found was Michaels I think. Thanks. Lowriders95s10 (talk) (Contribs) 08:18, November 17, 2010 (UTC)
There was one more guard though. T.J. said Dunning, Graham, and someone else survived and Henderson died but I couldn't catch it. And that tracks with the what was said before in that Simeon killed 2 and wounded 4 and Henderson was the only one that died. Lowriders95s10 (talk) (Contribs) 22:28, November 17, 2010 (UTC)
Right and at 17:00 (no commercials) T.J. says all three names and it sounded like Loheed or maybe Lougheed. I'm not sure of the spelling. Lowriders95s10 (talk) (Contribs) 05:20, November 18, 2010 (UTC)
Excuse me RP, I just spent an aweful long time on my contribution only to find out 5 minutes after I submitted it you have deleted it, would you mind doing me the courtesy of telling me why? intsead of just going in head first.
He/she/it likes to delete stuff he/she/it doesent like.
Links to Gateworld Edit
Ok,ill stop,but In case you have not noticed,the Stargate franchise has almost come to a complete stop. The only new somewhat cannon information that will be comming for years will be from novels and spoilers. Gateworld fleets is the closest thing to a relevant continuation of the Stargate adventure as i have ever found online. Since all our major contributors are currently deployed or about to be exept for me,i was trying to work up some interest in the site. I was not forceing anyone to go,i wasent being impolite,i made sure they knew were they were going. Its not like i was adding links to something ungate related,or to something offensive or adding links for adverts or something. And i would appreciate it if you would stop erasing my posts that have no external links anymore,thank you. No reason too. Really getting anoying dude.
Well,that would be why i did not put any Gateworld fleets stuff on this wiki(duh) and simply put links or told them how to find it,and i speciafied the GWF was non cannon. This wiki has links to other wiki sites like the Avatar wiki,big bang theory and Transformers,which have way less to do with Stargate the GWF,also Like i said,there aint gonna be a whole lot to add to this wiki for a long time,so have fun. ill stop "adverting" the site,and "spamming"but i am completely in dissagrement and extreamly annoyed.
When i started off was not really putting any non liscensed (whatever) information on Stargate wiki,i was putting links to a site that is keeping Stargate alive,because i love Stargate and the franchise is pretty much dead. The site gives people alot more options for the SG-universe,and its not like my(never mind other people) links were hurting anything,they were discrete,like this(For more non cannon information on such and such click here) A single sentence,not like those freaking pop up add or vids that start playing with no warning. And it should matter even less on the talk pages,were people get to talk about a subject,and some people are like me,they would love some more info,and since Stargate wiki is never going to get more information on the subjects i was providing links to,i did not think (and still dont) that i was hurting anything,if anything i was being helpfull. When i found the first GWF(GWf is a wiki btw) site years ago i was thrilled, But whatever,my bad. Bad Llama*slaps hand* Another thing,what the heck is the external link even there for? Seriously,why is it there? If we are not allowed to add links to a site that has no relevant information for the Stargate franchise...like a wiki about bunnys or something.
So if external links are there to aid browsing,in your own words,why can they not browse on GWF exactly? Its a wiki. But whatever,ill get the word out one way or another about GWF even if Stargate wiki(or RP) will not let me add links on this site. Personaly,i think your too strict,but thats my oppion.
Stargate is a fabrication btw,so all the information on any wiki about any tv show or movie is not relevant. And as i said,Gateworld fleets is the closest thing to any relevant information about the Stargate universe,which wont be getting much more information for years to come. And its not like i was putting GWF articles on SG wiki,i was just putting links to another wiki.
We are starting another - canon only wiki : http://stargate-sgc.wikia.com/wiki/Stargate_Wiki! This will not be a brand new wiki, idea is to separate main canon free from the novel/roleplaying game/etc. materials, both wikias will have links to each other, so basically there will be two wikias - one for canon only materials, second for both canon and non canon materials. This is intended to end canon - non canon wars. You are welcome to join and and help to make canon only wiki by moving templates, artecles and pictures and making some new. Vilnisr T | C - 17:45, July 7, 2011 (UTC)
Lost Worlds Sci-fi and Fantasy Forum Edit
Just letting you all know that the forum previously known as Stargate New Seasons has changed to Lost Worlds Sci-fi and Fantasy Realms. Stargate is still our main fandom focus and will always remain so. I noticed a lot of comment re: the continuation of Stargate and that Gate World seems to get a lot of mention. It may well be the biggest, but the smalled forums are doing their bit as well and need your support. Our biggest part we play in this is cannon based and AU role play. We have one of the largest and most active Stargate Role plays going and would love to see new players join us. We also have all the usual you would expect to find on a fan driven forum. Fan Fiction, Art, general topics. We do have a science and technical section as well, it's not very active at the moment and we could use some help there.
you will find us here
RogueRanger (talk) (Contribs) 00:45, March 13, 2012 (UTC)